You are here: Home » Blog » Fiberglass Fabric Manufacturer-Air Jet Loom Vs. Shuttle Loom

Fiberglass Fabric Manufacturer-Air Jet Loom Vs. Shuttle Loom

Views: 0     Author: Site Editor     Publish Time: 2025-07-07      Origin: Site

Air Jet Loom vs. Shuttle Loom: Key Differences

When weaving fiberglass fabrics, the choice between air jet looms and shuttle looms impacts production speed, fabric quality, cost, and fiber compatibility. Below is a detailed comparison:



1. Air Jet Loom

How It Works

  • Uses high-pressure air jets to propel the weft yarn across the warp.

  • Fully automated, with computerized controls for precision.

Advantages

✅ Extremely Fast – 600–1,500 picks per minute (PPM) (vs. 100–200 PPM for shuttle looms).
✅ Lower Labor Costs – Minimal manual intervention needed.
✅ Energy Efficient – Uses compressed air instead of mechanical parts.
✅ Best for Lightweight Fabrics – Works well with fine yarns (e.g., fiberglass styles 106, 1080).

Disadvantages

❌ Struggles with Heavy Yarns – Not ideal for thick fiberglass due to yarn weight.
❌ Higher Initial Cost – More expensive than shuttle looms.
❌ Yarn Breakage Risk – High-speed air can damage brittle glass fibers.

Best For:
✔ High-volume production of lightweight fiberglass (106, 1080, 2116).
✔ Synthetic fabrics (polyester, nylon).



2. Shuttle Loom

How It Works

  • Uses a wooden/metal shuttle to carry the weft thread back and forth.

  • Oldest weaving technology, still used in some traditional factories.

Advantages

✅ Handles Heavy Yarns Well – Good for thick fiberglass (7628, 2156).
✅ Low Initial Cost – Cheaper than air jet or rapier looms.
✅ Durable Weaves – Produces tightly woven, strong fabrics.

Disadvantages

❌ Very Slow – Only 100–200 PPM (significantly lower than air jet).
❌ High Noise & Vibration – Not suitable for modern automated factories.
❌ More Labor-Intensive – Requires frequent manual adjustments.

Best For:
✔ Small-scale or specialty fiberglass production.
✔ Heavy industrial fabrics where speed is not critical.



3. Key Comparison Table

Feature

Air Jet Loom

Shuttle Loom

Speed (PPM)

600–1,500

100–200

Fabric Weight

Light-Medium

Medium-Heavy

Fiberglass Suitability

106, 1080, 2116

7628, 2156

Automation

Fully Automated

Manual/Semi-Auto

Initial Cost

High

Low

Maintenance

Moderate

High (mechanical wear)

Yarn Breakage Risk

Medium (due to air tension)

Low



4. Which is Better for Fiberglass?

  • For lightweight fiberglass (106, 1080, 2116) → Air jet loom (faster, more efficient).

  • For heavy fiberglass (7628, 2156) → Shuttle loom (handles thick yarns better).

  • For cost savings in small batches → Shuttle loom (cheaper setup).

  • For mass production → Air jet loom (if yarnn weight allows).

Modern Alternative:

  • Rapier looms (a middle-ground option) are often preferred for medium-weight fiberglass (2116, 7628) because they balance speed and yarn handling.



5. Conclusion

  • Air jet looms dominate high-speed production but struggle with heavy fabrics.

  • Shuttle looms are fading but still useful for heavy-duty fiberglass in small factories.

  • For 7628 fiberglass, rapier looms are often the best compromise.


For any inquiry,Please contact +86 13961185092 Jackson Zhao (Wechat & Whatsapp)


Consult Your RIGHT Composite Products Experts

We help you avoid the pitfalls to deliver the quality and value your fo need, on-time and on-budget.

medam
© COPYRIGHT 2023 RIGHT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.